Bug#401969: please build using hunspell
mh at glandium.org
Fri Dec 8 22:32:50 CET 2006
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 11:26:34AM +0100, Rene Engelhard <rene at debian.org> wrote:
> There's no big difference in using hunspell and myspell, except that hunspell dictionaries
> then will also work. And you show that hunspell is used so the security team knows
> that mozilla needs to be rebuilt (which probably won't happen, no one ever found a security bug
> in either hunspell or myspell). And in any case, there's already enchant and openoffice.org building
> with static hunspell (openoffice.org does build far longer than ice*)
How does the security team feel about having to rebuild iceape,
iceweasel, icedove (you forgot to file a bug on icedove), OOo and enchant
if there happens to be a security bug in hunspell ?
How do buildds feel to have to rebuild iceape, iceweasel, icedove, OOo
and enchant for every hunspell upload ?
More information about the pkg-mozilla-maintainers