Security updates for mozilla based software [Was: Security updates]

[Mike Hommey]

On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 12:49:26PM +0100, Alexander Sack <asac at debian.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 25, 2006 at 10:16:12PM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > Eric Dorland wrote:
> > >Alexander Sack wrote:
> > >>On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 01:43:40PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > >>>Oops, I decided to follow-up to debian-release after setting the subject
> > >>>and forgot to change it. So, here is a proper subject.
> > >>>
> > >>>On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 01:40:37PM +0100, Mike Hommey 
> > >>><mh at glandium.org> wrote:
> > >>>>Hi
> > >>>>
> > >>>>I see Alex has uploaded version 1.5.0.9 of icedove. What should we take
> > >>>>as a course of action for xulrunner, iceweasel and iceape ?
> > >>>>Should we go with newer upstreams (note there's no official xulrunner
> > >>>>release, but I fake them taking from tags in upstream cvs) or backport
> > >>>>security fixes ?
> > >>>>
> > >>
> > >>Please lets upload new upstream versions as long as possible - e.g. as
> > >>long as etch is not released. Those are just minor upstream version
> > >>shifts, so taking them entirely should be pretty safe imo.
> > >
> > >Right, I agree. In fact I'm building 2.0.0.1 packages right now on my 
> > >laptop, but I might need you to sign and upload them Mike. Sorry it's 
> > >taken me a while, life's been very busy the last month.
> > 
> > In fact I am away from my gpg key, so if you could sign & upload the 
> > package at http://people.debian.org/~eric/iceweasel/. New iceweasel 
> > package for christmas :)
> > 
> 
> If Mike has no time, I could do the NMU. Mike?

Seems someone already did the upload...

Mike