mh at glandium.org
Thu Dec 28 20:50:22 UTC 2006
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 02:20:34AM -0800, Steve Langasek <vorlon at debian.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 01:40:37PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > I see Alex has uploaded version 126.96.36.199 of icedove. What should we take
> > as a course of action for xulrunner, iceweasel and iceape ?
> > Should we go with newer upstreams (note there's no official xulrunner
> > release, but I fake them taking from tags in upstream cvs) or backport
> > security fixes ?
> > If the latter, alex, do you have a patch set for this ?
> Um, this is completely without context for me. Is there something the
> release team is being asked to comment on?
> I don't care about version numbers of things you upload to unstable for
> etch, I only care about what shows up in a debdiff. I think that policy is
> spelled out pretty clearly, or do you have questions about it?
To make it very clear : do you prefer security updates or new upstreams
(security updates + version change + minor functional changes) ?
More information about the pkg-mozilla-maintainers