Fwd: seamonkey progress, part II

Hendrik-Jan Heins hjheins at gmail.com
Wed Oct 4 10:18:37 UTC 2006


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Hendrik-Jan Heins <hjheins at gmail.com>
Date: 4-okt-2006 12:17
Subject: Re: seamonkey progress, part II
To: Mike Hommey <mh at glandium.org>


How about making a dev that doesn't contain the stuff that is linked
to the seamonkey-common package? That should be what is also in the
xulrunner dev packages?

Hendrik-Jan

2006/10/4, Mike Hommey <mh at glandium.org>:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 12:31:38AM +0200, Alexander Sack <asac at jwsdot.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 11:50:47PM +0200, Hendrik-Jan Heins wrote:
> > > I've done a new build. This time I took the js-debugger and dev packages
> > > out.
> > > But I do agree with Alexander: I think the -dev package is needed for
> > > now. When Seamonkey is based on xulrunner, then I can take out parts
> > > related to nspr and nss, but the -dev is still needed, as Thunderbird
> > > and Seamonkey-mailnews are not the same.
> >
> > Mike can you rephrase why you are so firmly against a -dev package? Why
> > can't you live with seamonkey providing a -dev package? Is it really
> > such a PITA?
>
> I'd be much less concerned by seamonkey providing a -dev if it didn't
> provide what libxul-dev provides, *especially* the libgtkmozembed stuff.
>
> Now, I have to admit that everything is not provided by xulrunner, and
> that at least some dev files have to be provided...
>



More information about the pkg-mozilla-maintainers mailing list