seamonkey progress III

[Hendrik-Jan Heins]

From: Hendrik-Jan Heins <hjheins at gmail.com>
Date: 6-okt-2006 16:51
Subject: Re: seamonkey progress III
To: Mike Hommey <mh at glandium.org>


Mike,

that is possible. I could fairly easy modify the 1.1 files to build 1.0.5
But the patches are a different issue. Should we do a 1.0.5 without patches?

Hendrik-Jan

2006/10/6, Mike Hommey <mh at glandium.org>:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 03:32:31PM +0200, Alexander Sack <asac at debian.org> wrote:
> > > That's about it!
> > > One last thing: which version should go into Etch? 1.0.5 or 1.1 ? And
> > > who to ask about this?
> > >
> >
> > I can't tell ... I don't think final 1.8.1 branch versions will be out
> > in time for the freeze ... so probably we should go the safe way and
> > use the 1.8.0 branch versions (aka 1.0.5 for your case).
>
> See the thread starting at
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2006/09/msg00300.html
> As far as the new branch packages are tested, we can expect exceptions to
> push them into etch, which should be better for everyone.
>
> As for seamonkey itself, maybe we could upload 1.0.5 in unstable and
> 1.1 alpha in experimental, request testing for the latter, and see if we
> can decently go for 1.1 for etch.
>
> Mike
>