seamonkey progress III

[Mike Hommey]

On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 04:53:39PM +0200, Alexander Sack <asac at jwsdot.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 04:41:20PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 03:32:31PM +0200, Alexander Sack <asac at debian.org> wrote:
> > > > That's about it!
> > > > One last thing: which version should go into Etch? 1.0.5 or 1.1 ? And
> > > > who to ask about this?
> > > >
> > > 
> > > I can't tell ... I don't think final 1.8.1 branch versions will be out
> > > in time for the freeze ... so probably we should go the safe way and
> > > use the 1.8.0 branch versions (aka 1.0.5 for your case).
> > 
> > See the thread starting at
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2006/09/msg00300.html
> > As far as the new branch packages are tested, we can expect exceptions to
> > push them into etch, which should be better for everyone.
> 
> Mike, unless you want to help supporting security on the long run and
> have time to do so and assuming thunderbird 2.0 won't make it, I
> cannot provide security for two branches ... really. Please lets use
> the same branch for everything.

Damn, when is thunderbird 2.0 due, again ?

Mike