seamonkey progress III
eric at debian.org
Fri Oct 6 18:15:33 UTC 2006
* Alexander Sack (asac at jwsdot.com) wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 06:53:03PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 04:53:39PM +0200, Alexander Sack <asac at jwsdot.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 04:41:20PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 03:32:31PM +0200, Alexander Sack <asac at debian.org> wrote:
> > > > > > That's about it!
> > > > > > One last thing: which version should go into Etch? 1.0.5 or 1.1 ? And
> > > > > > who to ask about this?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I can't tell ... I don't think final 1.8.1 branch versions will be out
> > > > > in time for the freeze ... so probably we should go the safe way and
> > > > > use the 1.8.0 branch versions (aka 1.0.5 for your case).
> > > >
> > > > See the thread starting at
> > > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2006/09/msg00300.html
> > > > As far as the new branch packages are tested, we can expect exceptions to
> > > > push them into etch, which should be better for everyone.
> > >
> > > Mike, unless you want to help supporting security on the long run and
> > > have time to do so and assuming thunderbird 2.0 won't make it, I
> > > cannot provide security for two branches ... really. Please lets use
> > > the same branch for everything.
> > Damn, when is thunderbird 2.0 due, again ?
> Dunno ... I just red your post to debian-release. There you said "End
> of Nov".
Hmmm, which post was that?
Eric Dorland <eric at kuroneko.ca>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: hooty at jabber.com
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mozilla-maintainers/attachments/20061006/d4db5f89/attachment.pgp
More information about the pkg-mozilla-maintainers