seamonkey progress III

[Hendrik-Jan Heins]

Thanks!

I'll do a testrun with them.

Hendrik-Jan

2006/10/7, Mike Hommey <mh at glandium.org>:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 07:12:04PM +0200, Hendrik-Jan Heins <hjheins at gmail.com> wrote:
> > *lol*
> >
> > ok, here it is again:
> >
> > [   ] 10_components_no_exec.dpatch         31-Aug-2006 14:06     1k
> >               not used.
>
> Necessary
>
> > [   ] 10_dash_workaround.dpatch            31-Aug-2006 14:07     1k
> >               not used.
>
> Necessary
>
> > [   ] 10_icons.dpatch                      31-Aug-2006 14:06     1k
> >               Not sure yet
>
> Ported. The incriminated files were in suite/branding, and needed
> different changes. The files didn't get installed by make install at
> all, which happens quite often with mozilla stuff...
>
> > [   ] 10_no_chromelist.dpatch              31-Aug-2006 14:06     1k
> >               Not sure yet
>
> Leaving it non applied for the moment, I'll see when I'll get a
> seamonkey package if it is necessary.
>
> > [   ] 15_overthespot.dpatch                31-Aug-2006 14:06     7k
> >               broken
>
> Applied upstream
>
> > [   ] 15_passwdmgr.dpatch                  31-Aug-2006 14:07     3k
> >               Already in there.
>
> Not applied upstream on 1.0.5.
>
> > [   ] 18_arm_xpcom_unused_attribute.dpatch 31-Aug-2006 14:07     1k
>
> Not applied upstream on 1.0.5.
>
> > [   ] 18_m68k_xpcom.dpatch                 31-Aug-2006 14:07     1k
>
> Not applied upstream on 1.0.5.
>
> > [   ] 20_broken_perl.dpatch                31-Aug-2006 14:07     1k
> >               Already in there
>
> Not applied upstream on 1.0.5.
>
> > [   ] 20_pangoxft.dpatch                   31-Aug-2006 14:07     1k
> >               Broken
>
> Necessary on 1.0.5, and applies fine as is. Obsoletes pangocairo.dpatch
>
> > [   ] 20_visibility.dpatch                 31-Aug-2006 14:07     1k
> >               Broken
>
> Necessary on 1.0.5, and applies fine as is.
>
> > [   ] 25_entropy.dpatch                    31-Aug-2006 14:07     1k
> >               Used.
> >
> > [   ] 25_gnome_helpers_with_params.dpatch  31-Aug-2006 14:07    14k
>
> Necessary
>
> > [   ] 25_xrender_bug_workaround.dpatch     31-Aug-2006 14:07     2k
> >               Broken
>
> Necessary on 1.0.5, and applies fine as is.
>
> > [   ] 28_ppc64_build.dpatch                31-Aug-2006 14:06     1k
>
> Necessary
>
> > [   ] 30_distclean.dpatch                  31-Aug-2006 14:07    10k
> >               Broken
>
> I'll see after a build
>
> > [   ] 30_embedding_tests.dpatch            31-Aug-2006 14:06     3k
> >               Used
> >
> > [   ] 30_killAll.dpatch                    31-Aug-2006 14:07     1k
> >               Used
> >
> > [   ] 32_print_command.dpatch              31-Aug-2006 14:06     1k
> >               Already in there
>
> Not applied upstream on 1.0.5.
>
> > [   ] 35_crash_focus.dpatch                31-Aug-2006 14:07     4k
> >               Not sure this is needed; these files are extensively changed
> >               already
>
> Not applied upstream on 1.0.5.
>
> > [   ] 38_arm_xpcom_optim.dpatch            31-Aug-2006 14:07     1k
> > [   ] 38_hppa_xpcom.dpatch                 31-Aug-2006 14:06     8k
> > [   ] 38_ia64_align.dpatch                 31-Aug-2006 14:07     3k
> > [   ] 38_mips64_build.dpatch               31-Aug-2006 14:06     1k
> > [   ] 38_mips_xpcom.dpatch                 31-Aug-2006 14:06    14k
> > [   ] 38_sparc64_unichar_alignment.dpatch  31-Aug-2006 14:06     6k
>
> All necessary
>
> > [   ] 38_unsupported_arch_build.dpatch     31-Aug-2006 14:07     1k
> >               Used.
> >
> > [   ] 60_xpcomstub.dpatch                  31-Aug-2006 14:07     1k
> >               Already in there
>
> Not exactly, but I think it is not necessary on seamonkey, anyway.
>
> > [   ] 65_mouse_buttons.dpatch              31-Aug-2006 14:07     1k
> >               No idea what the advantage is of this
> >
> > [   ] 68_mips_performance.dpatch           31-Aug-2006 14:07     1k
>
> Necessary
>
> > [   ] 80_install_path.dpatch               31-Aug-2006 14:06     1k
> >               Not needed, it installs on the correct path
> >
> > [   ] 80_libxpcom_hack.dpatch              31-Aug-2006 14:07     1k
> >               Still not sure
>
> Necessary, and ported.
>
> > [   ] 80_no_sys_profile.dpatch             31-Aug-2006 14:06     1k
> >               Don't agree with what it fixes. I think new profiles depend
> >               on this.
>
> I'll check once I'll have a package.
>
> > [   ] 80_security_build.dpatch             31-Aug-2006 14:06     5k
> >               Broken
>
> Necessary on 1.0.5, and applies fine as is.
>
> > [   ] 80_uname.dpatch                      31-Aug-2006 14:07     2k
> >               Used
>
> Took a newer version of the patch
>
> > [   ] 80_zip.dpatch                        31-Aug-2006 14:06     4k
> >               Not used for now
> >
> > [   ] 82_locale.dpatch                     31-Aug-2006 14:06     1k
> >               Already in there
>
> Not fully. Necessary bit added.
>
> > [   ] 82_prefs.dpatch                      31-Aug-2006 14:07     3k
> >               Already in there
>
> Not applied upstream on 1.0.5.
>
> > [   ] 82_ssl.dpatch                        31-Aug-2006 14:06     1k
> >               Already in there
>
> Not applied upstream on 1.0.5.
>
> > [   ] 85_useragent.dpatch                  31-Aug-2006 14:06     2k
> >               Already in there
>
> Not applied upstream on 1.0.5.
>
> I'm also trying to get rid of cdbs, which is only used for dpatch and
> the ugly tarball thing. You'd be using the cdbs magic, I probably would
> have left it as is, but that's too much to ask me to tolerate the
> tarball in tarball thing.
>
> The next step will be to rename the whole damn thing.
>
> Stay tuned.
>
> Mike
>