backport patches for RC 1.8.1.5 release

Moritz Muehlenhoff jmm at inutil.org
Sun Jul 22 16:02:54 UTC 2007


On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 11:43:32AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 09:19:55PM +0200, Mike Hommey <mh at glandium.org> wrote:
> > Dammit, I'll have to build them all again. I overlooked the fact that
> > their stupid configure script silently make the whole thing statically
> > linked against internally provided libpng if the version of the system
> > library is older than the one provided.
> 
> New uploads done:
> iceweasel 2.0.0.5-0etch2
> iceape 1.0.10~pre070720-0etch2
> xulrunner 1.8.0.13~pre070720-0etch2.

I have just returned and only noticed it right now: All etch2 builds
have been rejected, as the were done sourceful.

From: Debian Installer <installer at ftp-master.debian.org>
Subject: iceweasel_2.0.0.5-0etch2_i386.changes REJECTED
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 08:45:25 +0200

Rejected: iceweasel_2.0.0.5.orig.tar.gz file already exists in the Embargoed directory.

From: Debian Installer <installer at ftp-master.debian.org>
Subject: xulrunner_1.8.0.13~pre070720-0etch2_i386.changes REJECTED
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 09:10:27 +0200

Rejected: xulrunner_1.8.0.13~pre070720.orig.tar.gz file already exists in the Embargoed directory.

From: Debian Installer <installer at ftp-master.debian.org>
Subject: iceape_1.0.10~pre070720-0etch2_i386.changes REJECTED
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 09:45:31 +0200

Rejected: iceape_1.0.10~pre070720.orig.tar.gz file already exists in the Embargoed directory.



However, I'm wondering whether pushing out the etch1 builds would really
do harm? It will only cause problems in there were a libpng security problem
in the next 6-8 weeks. Afterwards it'll be obsoleted by a corrected 2.0.0.6
build. So, if you want to release this as etch2, please go ahead and upload,
otherwise we should stick with the etch1 builds.

Cheers,
        Moritz



More information about the pkg-mozilla-maintainers mailing list