Bug#511477: iceape: Shouldn't release with Lenny

[Mike Hommey]

On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 10:51:07PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > > Most of the rdeps should only need headers and possibly a .a provided in
> > > the -dev-bin package. There shouldn't be anything needing iceape-browser
> > > files, but that's only an assumption. That's why I asked to check
> > > whether they build without iceape-browser installed.
> > 
> > Ok, I'll try a few test builds tonight and post my findings to this bug.
> 
> I've built a trimmed-down iceape, which only leaves iceape-dev and iceape-dev-bin.
> 
> The results so far (some packages still need to be built, since they're somewhat
> large. For some reason we've seem to stuffed Xulrunner into the largest packages
> in Debian :-)
> 
> Not in Lenny:
> gecko-mediaplayer
> 
> Worked:
> vlc
> gnome-chemistry-utils
> gtk-vnc
> mozilla-bonobo
> totem
> mplayerplug-in
> rhythmbox
> 
> Not tested yet:
> gcj-4.2
> openoffice.org
> gcj-4.3
> cacao-oj6
> eclipse
> openjdk-6
> 
> Failed:
> mozilla-traybiff
> icedtea-gcjwebplugin
> classpath
> 
> The last three all failed to link against xpcom. Since icedove provides a
> libxpcom.so, do you think it might be possible to adapt builds deps to it?

I think it might be possible to just add it (and libxpcom_core.so) to
the iceape-dev-bin package, with a conflict with iceape-browser.

Mike