Bug#511477: iceape: Shouldn't release with Lenny

[Mike Hommey]

On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 07:49:59PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 07:25:39AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 10:51:07PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > > Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > > > > Most of the rdeps should only need headers and possibly a .a provided in
> > > > > the -dev-bin package. There shouldn't be anything needing iceape-browser
> > > > > files, but that's only an assumption. That's why I asked to check
> > > > > whether they build without iceape-browser installed.
> > > > 
> > > > Ok, I'll try a few test builds tonight and post my findings to this bug.
> > > 
> > > I've built a trimmed-down iceape, which only leaves iceape-dev and iceape-dev-bin.
> > > 
> > > The results so far (some packages still need to be built, since they're somewhat
> > > large. For some reason we've seem to stuffed Xulrunner into the largest packages
> > > in Debian :-)
> > > 
> > > Not in Lenny:
> > > gecko-mediaplayer
> > > 
> > > Worked:
> > > vlc
> > > gnome-chemistry-utils
> > > gtk-vnc
> > > mozilla-bonobo
> > > totem
> > > mplayerplug-in
> > > rhythmbox
> > > 
> > > Not tested yet:
> > > gcj-4.2
> > > openoffice.org
> > > gcj-4.3
> > > cacao-oj6
> > > eclipse
> > > openjdk-6
> > > 
> > > Failed:
> > > mozilla-traybiff
> > > icedtea-gcjwebplugin
> > > classpath
> > > 
> > > The last three all failed to link against xpcom. Since icedove provides a
> > > libxpcom.so, do you think it might be possible to adapt builds deps to it?
> > 
> > I think it might be possible to just add it (and libxpcom_core.so) to
> > the iceape-dev-bin package, with a conflict with iceape-browser.
> 
> That worked. I've been able to properly rebuild mozilla-traybiff, 
> icedtea-gcjwebplugin and classpath. 
> 
> I'll upload the fixed iceape to unstable once I've completed the remaining
> testbuilds of openoffice.org, cacao-oj6, eclipse and openjdk-6.

Could you send a patch against git://git.debian.org/pkg-mozilla/iceape.git, too ?
(Or at least the debdiff)

Thanks

Mike