Gnome without Gecko (?)

[Emilio Pozuelo Monfort]

Mike Hommey wrote:
> It is my understanding that the current gnome packages in experimental
> are all Gecko-clean. Is my understanding right, and if it is, do you
> have an idea as to when these packages may migrate to unstable ? That
> would help me a lot to get xulrunner-1.9.1 in unstable ;)

It is, although some of those using gecko aren't in experimental (e.g. yelp). I
guess we will upload them to unstable by the time GNOME 2.28 is released, which
is in one week.

Cheers,
Emilio

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mozilla-maintainers/attachments/20090916/92c4af3f/attachment.pgp>