Bug#624639: iceweasel: 4.0.1, vertical gradients do not work with debian build
Antonio Ospite
ospite at studenti.unina.it
Sat Apr 30 09:48:59 UTC 2011
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 11:21:46 +0200
Mike Hommey <mh at glandium.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 11:08:00AM +0200, Antonio Ospite wrote:
> > Package: iceweasel
> > Version: 4.0.1-1
> > Severity: normal
> >
[...]
> > and noticed that vertical gradients are not rendered correctly with the
> > Iceweasel 4.0.1 binary distributed by Debian, I verified they do work
> > with the Firefox binary provided by the upstream at
> > http://www.mozilla.com/it/firefox/
> >
> > Is this because I need to get some other dependency from experimental?
> >
> > This can be reproduced by visiting one of these sites:
> > http://www.the-art-of-web.com/css/linear-gradients/
> > http://www.dynamicdrive.com/style/csslibrary/item/css3_linear_gradients/
>
> The only thing I can think of that could explain the difference is
> cairo. If you have some time and disk space, would you be willing to try
> to rebuild iceweasel 4.0.1-1 locally, changing the
> debian/xulrunner.mozconfig file to remove the --enable-system-cairo
> line?
>
> > I did the tests with -safe-mode activated, running iceweasel from the
> > console and no messages were printed there.
> >
> > Side note: this also affects some elements in the UI, for instance the
> > tabs will look white-ish because they loose the gradients as specified
> > in the style referenced by chrome://browser/content/browser.xul
>
> That part would look like bug 616353.
>
And it was it indeed, installing nvidia drivers from experimental fixed
the vertical gradients as well, so I guess the binary from Mozilla was
not using hardware acceleration.
I think this bug can be closed as it is not really specific to Iceweasel.
Thanks a lot, Mike.
Best Regards,
Antonio
--
Antonio Ospite
http://ao2.it
PGP public key ID: 0x4553B001
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mozilla-maintainers/attachments/20110430/080ef98e/attachment.pgp>
More information about the pkg-mozilla-maintainers
mailing list