Bug#626068: iceweasel: Why only vintage Iceweasel are available in testing ?

[Daniel Kahn Gillmor]

On 05/09/2011 01:29 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 04:35:27PM +0200, mourad wrote:
>> So why it is not migrating to sid and testing to have bigger tester number and
>> to be more wildly available ?
>>
>> Is there any technical/ethical/political reason of that ?
> 
> A technical one:
> 
> $ build-rdeps xulrunner-dev

Mike, i think your implication here is that these packages won't fare
well with xulrunner-dev or libmozjs-dev > 1.9.1; is that right?  Has
anyone tried rebuilding them against the experimental dev packages?

Is there reason to believe that they won't build properly with them?

> firegpg

This one at least has been orphaned (by me) and can be removed from the
archive if it's holding up iceweasel 4.  Shall i request this?

	--dkg

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1030 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mozilla-maintainers/attachments/20110509/eb01da7a/attachment.pgp>