Would you please update iceweasel for Debian/Wheezy on armhf?

[Mike Hommey]

On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 12:32:00AM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 07:28:20AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 08:13:02AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > It tries to compile with gcc-4.9 on armhf? 
> > > 
> > > Mike I can sent you the full build logs for the failing architectures.
> > > At least for armhf it uses CC=gcc-4.9.
> > 
> > Gah, that's leftovers from a workaround for bug 748422. I removed the
> > build dependency, but forgot about the debian/rules part. Will fix this.
> > 
> > kFreeBSD builds failed because of a NSS bug.
> > s390 build failed because of a binutils issue.
> > mips/mipel/sparc probably failed because of limited resources or
> > something (the build was killed). I'll try disabling unified sources,
> > which tend to take longer and more memory to compile.
> 
> The new version has now built on these archs:
> iceweasel_31.2.0esr-3~deb7u1_amd64.changes  iceweasel_31.2.0esr-3~deb7u1_i386.changes
> iceweasel_31.2.0esr-3~deb7u1_armel.changes  iceweasel_31.2.0esr-3~deb7u1_powerpc.changes
> iceweasel_31.2.0esr-3~deb7u1_armhf.changes  iceweasel_31.2.0esr-3~deb7u1_s390x.changes
> 
> So this in fact provides a armhf build, but kfreebsd-* still fails (as does s390
> and sparc). I've copied the new build logs for kfreebsd-* to 
> https://people.debian.org/~jmm/

Could you also upload the new failed build logs for other architectures,
in case things are slightly different?

(kfreebsd failed on something different than it did with -2~deb7u1, and
this time, I'm inclined to just not do anything about it. Apparently,
kfreebsd didn't have pthread_condattr_setclock in wheezy ; the same code
builds on unstable)

Mike