[SCM] libav/experimental: spelling/grammar/wording

[siretart at users.alioth.debian.org]

The following commit has been merged in the experimental branch:
commit 78a3c678f62981ecd9a2be7ce70746c43c2f8e86
Author: Diego Biurrun <diego at biurrun.de>
Date:   Mon Jul 16 08:54:59 2007 +0000

    spelling/grammar/wording
    
    Originally committed as revision 9694 to svn://svn.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg/trunk

diff --git a/doc/faq.texi b/doc/faq.texi
index 01db96e..d26c6b5 100644
--- a/doc/faq.texi
+++ b/doc/faq.texi
@@ -419,12 +419,12 @@ see @url{http://www.iversenit.dk/dev/ffmpeg-headers/}
 
 see @url{http://svn.mplayerhq.hu/michael/trunk/docs/}
 
- at section how do i feed rtp-h263 (and likely other rtp bastardizations of codecs) to libavcodec?
+ at section how do I feed H.263-RTP (and likely other RTP bastardizations of codecs) to libavcodec?
 
-Remove _ALL_ rtp trash and either feed the fragments through a AVParser and
+Remove _ALL_ RTP trash and either feed the fragments through an AVParser and
 then into the decoder or merge the fragments yourself into proper frames and
-feed them into the decoder. Note! the payload of h263-rtp is is not valid
-h263 you at least have to merge the first and last bytes discarding rtp trash
+feed them into the decoder. Note: The payload of H.263-RTP is not valid
+H.263 you at least have to merge the first and last bytes discarding RTP trash
 from them, possibly more.
 
 @bye
diff --git a/doc/ffmpeg-doc.texi b/doc/ffmpeg-doc.texi
index c759e87..cec71f9 100644
--- a/doc/ffmpeg-doc.texi
+++ b/doc/ffmpeg-doc.texi
@@ -1503,8 +1503,8 @@ The TAB character is forbidden outside of Makefiles as is any
 form of trailing whitespace. Commits containing either will be
 rejected by the Subversion repository.
 
-Main priority in FFmpeg is simplicity and small code size (=less
-bugs).
+The main priority in FFmpeg is simplicity and small code size in order to
+minimize the bug count.
 
 Comments: Use the JavaDoc/Doxygen
 format (see examples below) so that code documentation
@@ -1689,7 +1689,7 @@ It also helps quite a bit if you tell us what the patch does (for example
 'replaces lrint by lrintf'), and why (for example '*BSD isn't C99 compliant
 and has no lrint()')
 
-Also please if you send several patches, send each patch as separate mail,
+Also please if you send several patches, send each patch as a separate mail,
 do not attach several unrelated patches to the same mail.
 
 @section patch submission checklist

-- 
Libav/FFmpeg packaging