[Pkg-mutt-maintainers] Maintainer/Uploaders change with 1.6.2, when was this discussed?

[Christoph Berg]

Re: Antonio Radici 2016-08-08 <20160808114416.GH5373 at cherubino.dyne.org>
> The main issue of this change for me was that I did miss it and I don't agree
> with it right now; I'm in favour of having the Maintainer field pointing to a
> team once in the medium term (which could be a couple of months).
> 
> As we discussed Faidon told me that he doesn't want the change to be reverted
> and if I do so he wants to be removed from the Uploaders, I don't think that
> this is going to work either.
> 
> My main concern with the change was that the Maintainer field was changed
> without an explicit agreement from the person who was in the field in the first
> place; you all know that I have never opposed or reverted any changes, at the
> same time I would like my voice to be heard especially for that particular
> change.

Hi Antonio,

I'm sorry that the Maintainer field was changed without your consent.

However, if you agree with moving the field to a team, I don't see
what moving it back now, and re-moving it forward again in a few
months would buy us. Your point that you didn't want to be moved out
is valid and was heard. But reverting the change would just add more
strangeness in the process.

Thanks for caring about Mutt,
Christoph
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mutt-maintainers/attachments/20160808/83c284f1/attachment.sig>