[Pkg-mutt-maintainers] Bug#837045: mutt: wrong handling of symbol '>' in conditional expression

Richard Russon rich at flatcap.org
Thu Sep 8 10:37:01 UTC 2016


Hi Andrey,

Thanks for the bug report.

> The problem is in part '%?M?<%M> ?'. Number of hidden messages in thread are
> only shown it thread is collapsed, like this '<10>'.

This is a known issue which comes from the "nested-if" patch.
Mutt allows you to nest conditionals, but the syntax is very scary --
requiring a LOT of escaping.

The solution was nested-if, which introduces the %<> notation.
I've attempted to document it, here:
    http://www.neomutt.org/feature/nested-if/

I haven't decided how to fix this problem, yet, so you have two options.
Escape the <> chars, or choose different ones.

The upstream (NeoMutt) bug is tracked, here:
    https://github.com/neomutt/neomutt/issues/113

Cheers,
    Rich / FlatCap
    NeoMutt maintainer

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mutt-maintainers/attachments/20160908/0f1bddc5/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the Pkg-mutt-maintainers mailing list