[Pkg-mutt-maintainers] Bug#810855: marked as done (mutt fails with BAD signature error if pgp_retainable_sigs = yes)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 25 Sep 2016 08:31:00 +0000
with message-id <20160925083100.65ftjutvxrajmnpo at cherubino.dyne.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#810855: mutt fails with BAD signature error if pgp_retainable_sigs = yes
has caused the Debian Bug report #810855,
regarding mutt fails with BAD signature error if pgp_retainable_sigs = yes
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner at bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
810855: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=810855
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: =?utf-8?q?Christian_B=C3=B6hme?= <chb00 at gmx.de>
Subject: mutt fails with BAD signature error if pgp_retainable_sigs = yes
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 21:56:29 +0100
Size: 10198
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mutt-maintainers/attachments/20160925/a9682ae0/attachment.mht>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Antonio Radici <antonio at debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#810855: mutt fails with BAD signature error if pgp_retainable_sigs = yes
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 08:31:00 +0000
Size: 2639
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mutt-maintainers/attachments/20160925/a9682ae0/attachment-0001.mht>