[Pkg-mutt-maintainers] Bug#870635: mutt package is not using the official mutt tarball

[Jonathan Dowland]

On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 10:21:51PM +0000, Antonio Radici wrote:
>as I said on the original thread I'm planning to fix this, and as you 
>can see there have been no new releases until the fix is in place.

It would be great if you could summarize *in this bug* what's your plan 
of action.

We are packaging neomutt, but calling it mutt. The obvious solution is 
to rename the package.  "mutt" could be used as transitional name to 
smoothly handle upgrades. This would not need to live for more than one 
release.

This would not proclude someone else from packaging "vanilla" mutt if 
they wanted to.


-- 

Jonathan Dowland