[Pkg-mutt-maintainers] Bug#870635: mutt package is not using the official mutt tarball

Antonio Radici antonio at debian.org
Mon Nov 20 21:30:28 UTC 2017


Can I please ask both of you to stop this flame?

It's not helping anyone.

I'm currently the maintainer of the mutt package and I have made my commitment
to Kevin in multiple occasions to fix the current situation and I'm going to fix
it.

I've collaborated with Kevin in the past and he has always been very
collaborative, the same applies to the Richard from the neomutt community; the
relationship between the two hasn't been great but at the same time it is
legitimate to ask to package mutt as the mutt tarball and I'm going to honor
that commitment that I took in the past.

Please refrain from engaging in flames, it's just a waste of time and it's not
going to change the current situation or convince me to take a different avenue.

On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 01:18:26PM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 06:59:16PM +0000, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 10:35:52AM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
[...]



More information about the Pkg-mutt-maintainers mailing list