net-tools: How to get Red Hat's patches into upstream ?

Mike Frysinger vapier at
Mon Nov 28 21:45:10 UTC 2011

On Monday 28 November 2011 07:56:36 Jiri Popelka wrote:
> On 11/25/2011 10:27 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Friday 25 November 2011 15:50:25 Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> >> Am 25.11.2011 21:16, schrieb Mike Frysinger:
> >>> could we setup a mailing list for people to subscribe to ? and another
> >>> for sending commit messages to ?
> >> 
> >> Yes, we had the commit ML before. Does sourceforge support this (with
> >> GIT?) . The second list would be a maintainers address?
> > 
> > i was thinking one list for development so people could quickly post
> > patches with `git send-email`.  the 2nd would be a list where commits
> > would get posted (and anyone could subscribe/respond).
> Sending patches to some list via 'git send-email' would be ideal I think.
> I personally don't need the list with posted commits as I use rss
> =rss

the commit list makes responding to merged patches easier.  but i guess if we 
impose a "all patches should be posted to the list before committing" policy, 
that shouldn't be necessary.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <>

More information about the Pkg-net-tools-maintainers mailing list