route listing: small glitch

[L.Schmidt]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi net-tools team,
I believe that route, when called without -n option, should consider
both destination and netmask when determining whether a route may be
the default route, not just destination 0.0.0.0. Some tunneling
software adds two /1 routes , to supersede default route without
replacing it, such as
0.0.0.0/128.0.0.0
128.0.0.0/128.0.0.0
First of those routes will be annotated as "default" while it clearly
isn't. In contrast, ip route from iproute2 package gets this right.
Kindly Yours,
L.Schmidt
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=TbdJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----