[Pkg-octave-commit] r2153 - octave-forge-pkgs
Rafael Laboissiere
rafael at alioth.debian.org
Sun Jun 15 18:25:23 UTC 2008
Author: rafael
Date: 2008-06-15 18:25:23 +0000 (Sun, 15 Jun 2008)
New Revision: 2153
Modified:
octave-forge-pkgs/TODO
Log:
Add checkboxes and checkbox cookies
Modified: octave-forge-pkgs/TODO
===================================================================
--- octave-forge-pkgs/TODO 2008-06-15 18:19:33 UTC (rev 2152)
+++ octave-forge-pkgs/TODO 2008-06-15 18:25:23 UTC (rev 2153)
@@ -2,35 +2,35 @@
#+STARTUP: content
#+TYP_TODO: TODO STARTED DONE
-* ann
- - Compilation kd_dump.cpp fails (undeclBared strcmp and exit)
- - According to src/ann/License.txt, the files under src/ann/* are under
+* ann [0/3]
+ - [ ] Compilation kd_dump.cpp fails (undeclBared strcmp and exit)
+ - [ ] According to src/ann/License.txt, the files under src/ann/* are under
the LGPL, and not the GPL as written in debian/copyright. Check this.
- - doc/src/ann/ANNmanual.pdf: lacking sources
+ - [ ] doc/src/ann/ANNmanual.pdf: lacking sources
-* bim
- - doc/tutorial.html: No copyright notice (should we assume the same as in
+* bim [0/3]
+ - [ ] doc/tutorial.html: No copyright notice (should we assume the same as in
COPYING?)
- - debian/control: lacks long description
- - Set Autoload to yes (via quilt patch)
+ - [ ] debian/control: lacks long description
+ - [ ] Set Autoload to yes (via quilt patch)
-* civil-engineering
- - TW: Is packaging this really worth it? Three .m files with
+* civil-engineering [0/1]
+ - [ ] TW: Is packaging this really worth it? Three .m files with
Copyright from 2000 and I fail to see why this is specific to
civil engineering?
-* database
- - DESCRIPTION says BSD, but:
+* database [0/2]
+ - [ ] DESCRIPTION says BSD, but:
licensecheck --recursive --check='.*' database | grep GPL
database/src/mysql_filtered.h: GPL (v2) (with incorrect FSF address)
Can we actually link GPL2 only code against Octave with GPL3?
- - Compilation fails. This has been [[http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.phpthread_name%3D20080521070015.GC22437%40localhost&forum_name%3Doctave-dev][reported]] in octave-dev, but we got
+ - [ ] Compilation fails. This has been [[http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.phpthread_name%3D20080521070015.GC22437%40localhost&forum_name%3Doctave-dev][reported]] in octave-dev, but we got
no answer so far.
-* engine
- - TW: I'm strongly against even considering packaging this. We have
+* engine [0/1]
+ - [ ] TW: I'm strongly against even considering packaging this. We have
enough work without pre-alpha code, that seems to have had its
last real change in 2002.
@@ -42,9 +42,9 @@
*might* allow *some people* to integrate Octave into their F77/C/C++
programs.
-* graceplot
- - debian/control: Add description
- - Compilation fails with:
+* graceplot [0/2]
+ - [ ] debian/control: Add description
+ - [ ] Compilation fails with:
Can't open display
Failed initializing GUI, exiting
@@ -55,88 +55,88 @@
Perhaps we should consider using xvfb for building the package?
-* integration
- - debian/control: Add description
- - debian/copyright: Add copyright notices
- - licensecheck gives "*No copyright* UNKNOWN" for all inst/*.m and
+* integration [0/3]
+ - [ ] debian/control: Add description
+ - [ ] debian/copyright: Add copyright notices
+ - [ ] licensecheck gives "*No copyright* UNKNOWN" for all inst/*.m and
inst/*/*.m files. This should be verified.
-* java
- - debian/control: Add description
- - debian/copyright: Add copyright notices
- - Add appropriated build-dependencies and dependencies
+* java [0/3]
+ - [ ] debian/control: Add description
+ - [ ] debian/copyright: Add copyright notices
+ - [ ] Add appropriated build-dependencies and dependencies
-* jhandles
- - debian/control: Add description
- - debian/copyright: Add copyright notices
- - Add appropriated build-dependencies and dependencies
+* jhandles [0/3]
+ - [ ] debian/control: Add description
+ - [ ] debian/copyright: Add copyright notices
+ - [ ] Add appropriated build-dependencies and dependencies
-* mapping
- - debian/control: Add description
- - debian/copyright: Add copyright notices
- - Some inst/*.m files have truncated GPL headers
+* mapping [0/3]
+ - [ ] debian/control: Add description
+ - [ ] debian/copyright: Add copyright notices
+ - [ ] Some inst/*.m files have truncated GPL headers
-* multicore
- - debian/control: Add description
- - debian/copyright: Add copyright notices
- - inst/*.m, src/existfile.c, doc/multicore.html: licensecheck report
+* multicore [0/3]
+ - [ ] debian/control: Add description
+ - [ ] debian/copyright: Add copyright notices
+ - [ ] inst/*.m, src/existfile.c, doc/multicore.html: licensecheck report
these files as "*No copyright* UNKNOWN"
-* ocs
- - debian/control: Add description
- - debian/copyright: Add copyright notices
- - Set Autoload to yes (via quilt patch)
+* ocs [0/3]
+ - [ ] debian/control: Add description
+ - [ ] debian/copyright: Add copyright notices
+ - [ ] Set Autoload to yes (via quilt patch)
-* pdb
- - debian/control: Add description
- - debian/copyright: Add copyright notices
- - inst/*.mat: Are we allowed to distribute MAT files? Should they have
+* pdb [0/3]
+ - [ ] debian/control: Add description
+ - [ ] debian/copyright: Add copyright notices
+ - [ ] inst/*.mat: Are we allowed to distribute MAT files? Should they have
specific licensing conditions?
-* secs1d
- - debian/control: Add description
- - debian/copyright: Add copyright notices
- - Set Autoload to yes (via quilt patch)
+* secs1d [0/3]
+ - [ ] debian/control: Add description
+ - [ ] debian/copyright: Add copyright notices
+ - [ ] Set Autoload to yes (via quilt patch)
-* secs2d
- - debian/control: Add description
- - debian/copyright: Add copyright notices
- - licensecheck reports some *.m files as having "*No copyright* UNKNOWN".
+* secs2d [0/4]
+ - [ ] debian/control: Add description
+ - [ ] debian/copyright: Add copyright notices
+ - [ ] licensecheck reports some *.m files as having "*No copyright* UNKNOWN".
This should be checked
- - Set Autoload to yes (via quilt patch)
+ - [ ] Set Autoload to yes (via quilt patch)
-* special-matrix
- - We decided to not pacakge this. The single file distributed in this
+* special-matrix [0/1]
+ - [ ] We decided to not pacakge this. The single file distributed in this
package is now included in miscellaneous
-* symband
- - doc/SymBandDoc.pdf: lack sources
- - debian/control: Add description
- - debian/copyright: Add copyright notices
- - inst/*.m: These files lack copyright notices and licensing conditions
+* symband [0/4]
+ - [ ] doc/SymBandDoc.pdf: lack sources
+ - [ ] debian/control: Add description
+ - [ ] debian/copyright: Add copyright notices
+ - [ ] inst/*.m: These files lack copyright notices and licensing conditions
(can we assume they follow the COPYING file?)
-* tcl-octave
- - Should we rename this pacakge to simply octave-tcl, instead of
+* tcl-octave [0/5]
+ - [ ] Should we rename this pacakge to simply octave-tcl, instead of
octave-tcl-octave?
- - inst/octave.tcl: lacks copyright notice
- - debian/control: Add description
- - debian/copyright: Add copyright notices
- - Add dependency on Tcl
+ - [ ] inst/octave.tcl: lacks copyright notice
+ - [ ] debian/control: Add description
+ - [ ] debian/copyright: Add copyright notices
+ - [ ] Add dependency on Tcl
-* triangular
- - debian/control: Add description
- - debian/copyright: Add copyright notices
- - src/doc.info: lacks sources and licensing conditions
- - src/uppertri.cc: lacks copyright owners licensing conditions
- - Set Autoload to yes (via quilt patch)
+* triangular [0/5]
+ - [ ] debian/control: Add description
+ - [ ] debian/copyright: Add copyright notices
+ - [ ] src/doc.info: lacks sources and licensing conditions
+ - [ ] src/uppertri.cc: lacks copyright owners licensing conditions
+ - [ ] Set Autoload to yes (via quilt patch)
-* video
- - Fails to compile against libavformat-dev (at least on amd64)
+* video [0/1]
+ - [ ] Fails to compile against libavformat-dev (at least on amd64)
-* xraylib
- - debian/control: Add description
- - debian/copyright: Add copyright notices
- - Clarify licensing terms for upstream's upstream files in src/*. The
+* xraylib [0/3]
+ - [ ] debian/control: Add description
+ - [ ] debian/copyright: Add copyright notices
+ - [ ] Clarify licensing terms for upstream's upstream files in src/*. The
terms are not very clear in the e-mail message sent by the author and
reported in src/note_from_xraylib_author.txt
More information about the Pkg-octave-commit
mailing list