[Pkg-octave-commit] r2959 - octave-forge-pkgs
Rafael Laboissiere
rafael at alioth.debian.org
Wed Apr 15 12:16:35 UTC 2009
Author: rafael
Date: 2009-04-15 12:16:35 +0000 (Wed, 15 Apr 2009)
New Revision: 2959
Modified:
octave-forge-pkgs/TODO
Log:
Add section of each package
Modified: octave-forge-pkgs/TODO
===================================================================
--- octave-forge-pkgs/TODO 2009-04-15 11:59:33 UTC (rev 2958)
+++ octave-forge-pkgs/TODO 2009-04-15 12:16:35 UTC (rev 2959)
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
--*- org -*-
+#-*- org -*-
#+STARTUP: content
#+TYP_TODO: TODO STARTED DONE
-* ann [4/4]
+* ann (main) [4/4]
- [X] Compilation kd_dump.cpp fails (undeclared strcmp and exit)
- [X] According to src/ann/License.txt, the files under src/ann/* are under
the LGPL, and not the GPL as written in debian/copyright. Check this.
@@ -14,10 +14,10 @@
Update [2009-04-15 Wed]: All the issues above are solved in 1.0.1+dfsg-1,
which is now waiting for libann be approved by the ftp-master admins.
-* benchmark [0/1]
+* benchmark (main) [0/1]
- [ ] Start packaging
-* bim [0/4]
+* bim (extra) [0/4]
- [ ] doc/tutorial.html: No copyright notice (should we assume the same as in
COPYING?)
- [ ] debian/control: lacks long description
@@ -26,12 +26,12 @@
- [ ] Set Autoload to yes (via quilt patch)
- [ ] Upstream homepage as mentioned in description doesn't exist.
-* civil-engineering [0/1]
+* civil-engineering (extra) [0/1]
- [ ] TW: Is packaging this really worth it? Three .m files with
Copyright from 2000 and I fail to see why this is specific to
civil engineering?
-* database [0/2]
+* database (main) [0/2]
- [ ] DESCRIPTION says BSD, but:
licensecheck --recursive --check='.*' database | grep GPL
database/src/mysql_filtered.h: GPL (v2) (with incorrect FSF address)
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
- [ ] Compilation fails. This has been [[http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=20080521070015.GC22437%40localhost&forum_name=octave-dev][reported]] in octave-dev, but we got
no answer so far.
-* engine [0/1]
+* engine (extra) [0/1]
- [ ] TW: I'm strongly against even considering packaging this. We have
enough work without pre-alpha code, that seems to have had its
last real change in 2002.
@@ -58,13 +58,13 @@
*might* allow *some people* to integrate Octave into their F77/C/C++
programs.
-* fenv [0/1]
+* fenv (extra) [0/1]
- [ ] Start packaging
-* fpl [1/1]
+* fpl (extra) [1/1]
- [X] debian/control: Add description
-* graceplot [2/2]
+* graceplot (extra) [2/2]
- [X] debian/control: Add description
- [X] Compilation fails with:
@@ -83,90 +83,90 @@
This was fixed via the quilt patch no-toggle-in-pkg-add.diff. [RL]
-* integration [0/3]
+* integration (extra) [0/3]
- [ ] debian/control: Add description
- [ ] debian/copyright: Add copyright notices
- [ ] licensecheck gives "*No copyright* UNKNOWN" for all inst/*.m and
inst/*/*.m files. This should be verified.
-* java [0/3]
+* java (extra) [0/3]
- [ ] debian/control: Add description
- [ ] debian/copyright: Add copyright notices
- [ ] Add appropriated build-dependencies and dependencies
-* jhandles [0/3]
+* jhandles (extra) [0/3]
- [ ] debian/control: Add description
- [ ] debian/copyright: Add copyright notices
- [ ] Add appropriated build-dependencies and dependencies
-* mapping [0/3]
+* mapping (extra) [0/3]
- [ ] debian/control: Add description
- [ ] debian/copyright: Add copyright notices
- [ ] Some inst/*.m files have truncated GPL headers
-* multicore [0/3]
+* multicore (extra) [0/3]
- [ ] debian/control: Add description
- [ ] debian/copyright: Add copyright notices
- [ ] inst/*.m, src/existfile.c, doc/multicore.html: licensecheck report
these files as "*No copyright* UNKNOWN"
-* nlwing2 [0/1]
+* nlwing2 (extra) [0/1]
- [ ] Start packaging
-* nnet [1/1]
+* nnet (main) [1/1]
- [X] Clarify the copyright/license issues of the documentation files in
doc/latex
-* nurbs [0/1]
+* nurbs (extra) [0/1]
- [ ] Start packaging
-* ocs [0/3]
+* ocs (extra) [0/3]
- [ ] debian/control: Add description
- [ ] debian/copyright: Add copyright notices
- [ ] Set Autoload to yes (via quilt patch)
-* ode [0/1]
+* ode (extra) [0/1]
- [ ] Start packaging
-* pdb [0/3]
+* pdb (extra) [0/3]
- [ ] debian/control: Add description
- [ ] debian/copyright: Add copyright notices
- [ ] inst/*.mat: Are we allowed to distribute MAT files? Should they have
specific licensing conditions?
-* quaternion [0/1]
+* quaternion (extra) [0/1]
- [ ] Start packaging
-* secs1d [0/3]
+* secs1d (extra) [0/3]
- [ ] debian/control: Add description
- [ ] debian/copyright: Add copyright notices
- [ ] Set Autoload to yes (via quilt patch)
-* secs2d [0/4]
+* secs2d (extra) [0/4]
- [ ] debian/control: Add description
- [ ] debian/copyright: Add copyright notices
- [ ] licensecheck reports some *.m files as having "*No copyright* UNKNOWN".
This should be checked
- [ ] Set Autoload to yes (via quilt patch)
-* simp [0/1]
+* simp (extra) [0/1]
- [ ] Start packaging
-* soctcl [0/1]
+* soctcl (extra) [0/1]
- [ ] Start packaging
-* special-matrix [0/1]
+* special-matrix (extra) [0/1]
- [ ] We decided to not package this. The single file distributed in this
package is now included in miscellaneous
-* symband [0/4]
+* symband (extra) [0/4]
- [ ] doc/SymBandDoc.pdf: lack sources
- [ ] debian/control: Add description
- [ ] debian/copyright: Add copyright notices
- [ ] inst/*.m: These files lack copyright notices and licensing conditions
(can we assume they follow the COPYING file?)
-* tcl-octave [0/5]
+* tcl-octave (extra) [0/5]
- [ ] Should we rename this package to simply octave-tcl, instead of
octave-tcl-octave?
- [ ] inst/octave.tcl: lacks copyright notice
@@ -174,20 +174,20 @@
- [ ] debian/copyright: Add copyright notices
- [ ] Add dependency on Tcl
-* tk-octave [0/1]
+* tk-octave (extra) [0/1]
- [ ] Start packaging
-* triangular [0/5]
+* triangular (extra) [0/5]
- [ ] debian/control: Add description
- [ ] debian/copyright: Add copyright notices
- [ ] src/doc.info: lacks sources and licensing conditions
- [ ] src/uppertri.cc: lacks copyright owners licensing conditions
- [ ] Set Autoload to yes (via quilt patch)
-* video [0/1]
+* video (main) [0/1]
- [ ] Fails to compile against libavformat-dev (at least on amd64)
-* xraylib [0/3]
+* xraylib (extra) [0/3]
- [ ] debian/control: Add description
- [ ] debian/copyright: Add copyright notices
- [ ] Clarify licensing terms for upstream's upstream files in src/*. The
More information about the Pkg-octave-commit
mailing list