[Pkg-octave-devel] Copyright notice in web site

[Andre Lehovich]

On Fri, 15 Apr 2005, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> I checked gnu.org: OPL is considered as a non-free license.  However the
> Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 2.0 license
> (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/legalcode) qualifies as
> free.  Should we use the CCPL?

Debian considers OPL to be non-free.  Yet the main
debian.org web is under OPL.  Apparently many in Debian also
consider the CCAS2.0 to be non-free, see
http://people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary.html

I don't much care what the website uses; despite the claimed
non-freeness I think OPL or CCAS2.0 would be fine.

--Andre