[Pkg-octave-devel] Re: SUNDIALS shared libraries

[Rafael Laboissiere]

* Andrey Romanenko <andrey at enginum.com> [2005-10-28 22:58]:

> And that brings up another question: should we split the sundials package in 
> several packages, something like 
> sundials-cvode-serial
> sundials-kinsol-serial
> and so on and then have a virtual sundials-serial package with
> dependencies? This would allow a finer control and dependency
> capabilities. For example, if CVODES gets updated, packages that depend
> on, say, KINSOL should not be affected.

This is a sensible idea.  However, this may be an overkill until we
have a substantial number of package depending on different components
of SUNDIALS.  BTW, are there any plans to use SUNDIALS elsewhere than
in Octave?

-- 
Rafael