Bug#327027: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#327027: octave2.1: not installable
in sid
Rafael Laboissiere
rafael at debian.org
Sat Sep 10 19:55:09 UTC 2005
* John W. Eaton <jwe at bevo.che.wisc.edu> [2005-09-09 13:22]:
> On 9-Sep-2005, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
>
> | Too bad :<. Did you submit bugs to the gcc or Debian BTS (I looked
> | rapidly and did not find a relevant bug) ?
>
> No, sorry, I didn't.
It seems to be a glibc bug. According to:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=160759
the bug was already fixed by 2005-07-10. Indeed, the libc/ChangeLog at:
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/libc/ChangeLog?rev=1.9521&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup&cvsroot=glibc
has the following entry:
2005-07-07 Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat.com>
* sysdeps/generic/s_ctanh.c (__ctanh): Handle case of zero den better.
* sysdeps/generic/s_ctanhf.c (__ctanhf): Likewise.
* sysdeps/generic/s_ctanhl.c (__ctanhl): Likewise.
* sysdeps/generic/s_ctan.c (__ctan): Likewise.
* sysdeps/generic/s_ctanf.c (__ctanf): Likewise.
* sysdeps/generic/s_ctanl.c (__ctanl): Likewise.
Looking at the diff in the sources we see that there is a better treatment
of the case where the denominator is equal to 0.0:
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/libc/sysdeps/generic/s_ctanh.c.diff?r1=1.2&r2=1.3&cvsroot=glibc&f=h
John, could you please confirm that this would fix the bug?
--
Rafael
More information about the Pkg-octave-devel
mailing list