[Pkg-octave-devel] BTS status for the DOG

[Rafael Laboissiere]

* Thomas Weber <weber at num.uni-sb.de> [2005-09-20 08:24]:

> > Would you be willing to take the lead on this, please?  Although I doubt
> > that a new octaviz package would be eligible for inclusion in 3.1r1, it
> > is maybe worth trying to ask the release manager (is he still Martin
> > Schulze).
> I sent a mail to Joey (Martin Schulze).

Thanks.

> What needs to be done? A have a pure sarge machine (x86) around, is a
> simple 'dpkg-buildpackage' enough? (I've already done this and the
> package works, so my question is more in the direction of signing the
> package).

A dpkg-buildpackage should be enough.  As regards the signature, it
depends on where the package will be sent to.  If we just make it
available at the DOG website, then there is no need for signing.  If it
will go into 3.1r1, then I can sign it later.

At any rate, please make the files available somewhere when you are
done (.orig.tar.gz, .deb, .diff.gz, .dsc, .changes).

Cheers,

-- 
Rafael