[Pkg-octave-devel] Re: [Pkg-octave-commit] rev 816 - in trunk/packages/octplot/debian: . patches

[Thomas Weber]

Am Sonntag, den 03.12.2006, 17:11 +0100 schrieb Rafael Laboissiere:
> * Thomas Weber <thomas-guest at alioth.debian.org> [2006-12-03 15:25]:
> 
> > Author: thomas-guest
> > Date: 2006-12-03 15:25:35 +0100 (Sun, 03 Dec 2006)
> > New Revision: 816
> > 
> > Added:
> >    trunk/packages/octplot/debian/check-symlink.sh
> >    trunk/packages/octplot/debian/octplot.install
> >    trunk/packages/octplot/debian/patches/50_quiet_subplot.patch
> >    trunk/packages/octplot/debian/patches/50_supply_paths.patch
> > Modified:
> >    trunk/packages/octplot/debian/changelog
> >    trunk/packages/octplot/debian/compat
> >    trunk/packages/octplot/debian/control
> >    trunk/packages/octplot/debian/copyright
> >    trunk/packages/octplot/debian/rules
> > Log:
> > Bug fix for #401138 and #391117; the latter changes configure.ac, so we need
> > automake in the control file and definitions in rules for CDBS. 
> > We also put copyright files for the fonts under octplot's doc/ directory, using
> > octplot.install (dh_installdocs does not seem to be capable of creating
> > sub-directories of doc/, without moving everything from the subdirectory there
> > as well).
> > 
> > Compat level 5
> > 
> > Small typo fix in copyright
> > 
> > check-symlink.sh: abusing octplot as guinea-pig, see 
> > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-octave-devel/2006-November/001965.html
> 
> These are quite substantial changes.  Should we upload a new version? If
> yes, to which distribution?

I think we should upload, in order to get the buildds fixed (which means
that we should upload to _unstable_). I don't expect this version to be
part of etch, though. 

OTOH, the changes to root.cpp are rather small, so I don't think we've
introduced new bugs.

	Thomas