[Pkg-octave-devel] Re: [prudhomm@debian.org: [Pkg-scicomp-devel]
suitesparse and octave]
Rafael Laboissiere
rafael at debian.org
Fri Jan 5 11:22:06 CET 2007
* David Bateman <adb014 at gmail.com> [2007-01-04 22:21]:
> Ok, my fault.. Although it currently checks in sparsesuite, as the new
> name is suitesparse that is in fact where it should check. This patch
> should fix that and address your problem..
Thanks for that. Also, forget my question to you in my last post in this
thread.
As regards your patch:
> *** ./liboctave/oct-sparse.h.orig21 2007-01-04 22:19:32.188201467 +0100
> --- ./liboctave/oct-sparse.h 2007-01-04 22:19:14.618136917 +0100
> ***************
> *** 32,38 ****
> extern "C" {
> #endif
>
> ! #if defined (HAVE_SPARSESUITE_UMFPACK_H)
> #include <sparsesuite/umfpack.h>
> #elif defined (HAVE_UFSPARSE_UMFPACK_H)
> #include <ufsparse/umfpack.h>
> --- 32,38 ----
> extern "C" {
> #endif
>
> ! #if defined (HAVE_SUITESPARSE_UMFPACK_H)
> #include <sparsesuite/umfpack.h>
> #elif defined (HAVE_UFSPARSE_UMFPACK_H)
> #include <ufsparse/umfpack.h>
> [snip]
Shouldn't the above read "#include <suitesparse/umfpack.h>" intead of
"#include <sparsesuite/umfpack.h>"?
[Sorry, I am really confused by this naming issue.]
--
Rafael
More information about the Pkg-octave-devel
mailing list