[Pkg-octave-devel] Re: Latest version of octave2.9-forge
Rafael Laboissiere
rafael at debian.org
Fri Jan 12 09:44:59 CET 2007
* Rafael Laboissiere <rafael at debian.org> [2007-01-07 15:54]:
> Version 2006.07.09+dfsg1-6 of octave2.9-forge has been in unstable since 16
> days and has no bugs filed against it. Four bugs have been closed since
> the current version in testing (2006.07.09+dfsg1-4) was released: #393495,
> #403653, #403734, and #403864. None of these bugs were RC, but it would be
> good to have a bug-free version of octave2.9-forge in etch.
>
> However, before asking for hinting the latest version into etch, I need a
> clarification about a dependency issue, as shown in the page
> http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=octave2.9-forge:
>
> Dependency analysis (including build-depends; i386 only):
>
> * octave2.9-forge depends on libpng12-0 >= 1.2.8rel but testing has 1.2.15~beta5-1 (unstable has 1.2.15~beta5-1)
> o binary package libpng12-0 is part of source package libpng
> + libpng has the same version in unstable and testing (1.2.15~beta5-1)
> + info: libpng has a version in experimental (1.4.0~beta16-0)
>
> The only architecture in which octave2.9-forge depends on the old version
> of libpng12-0 is i386. Should I rebuild the package in an up-to-date etch
> chroot before asking for the hint?
* Julien Cristau <jcristau at debian.org> [2007-01-07 16:17]:
> On Sun, Jan 7, 2007 at 15:54:46 +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
>
> > Dependency analysis (including build-depends; i386 only):
> >
> > * octave2.9-forge depends on libpng12-0 >= 1.2.8rel but testing has 1.2.15~beta5-1 (unstable has 1.2.15~beta5-1)
>
> This page doesn't seem to know about ~ in version strings, so I think
> you can just ignore that bit.
Thanks for the clarification.
May I then ask the release managers to hint octave2.9-forge_2006.07.09+dfsg1-6
into etch?
--
Rafael
More information about the Pkg-octave-devel
mailing list