[Pkg-octave-devel] fw: gfortran transition release goal proposal

[Kamaraju Kusumanchi]

On Thursday 26 July 2007 1:03 pm, Cyril Brulebois wrote:

>
> > I have missed the previous discussions. Is there any reason going with
> > gfortran-4.1 instead of gfortran-4.2?
>
> As far as I understand it, yes. DOG packages needs -lgfortran_begin, see
> [1], which isn't available in gfortran-4.2. (There's also a missing
> -lgfortran for another package I don't remember the name right now.)
>

What are DOG packages? "apt-cache search dog" does not yield anything.

>  1.
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=maint&data=pkg-octave-de
>vel%40lists.alioth.debian.org&archive=no&pend-exc=done&sev-inc=critical&sev-
>inc=grave&sev-inc=serious
>

I was looking at 
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=432420 and to my surprise, I 
cannot reproduce the FTBFS. When I compiled matwrap , it compiles just fine. 
Does anyone else see this problem?

raju

-- 
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/
http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Get a free email account with anti spam protection.
http://www.bluebottle.com/tag/2