[Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#417494: octave2.1-forge and gcc 4.3

[brian m. carlson]

Since octave2.1 is marked wontfix (because it will no longer be relevant
when gcc 4.3 is the default), is it acceptable to tag this bug that way
as well?  I presume that octave2.1-forge depends on octave2.1, but I
haven't checked.

-- 
brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US
+1 713 440 7475 | http://crustytoothpaste.ath.cx/~bmc | My opinion only
OpenPGP: RSA v4 4096b 88AC E9B2 9196 305B A994 7552 F1BA 225C 0223 B187
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-octave-devel/attachments/20070903/1dae3a53/attachment.pgp