[Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#463039: why does octave3.0 provide: octave2.9?

[Thomas Weber]

On 29/01/08 17:16 +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> Sure, the "Provides: octave2.9" will be dropped and all the
> reverse-dependencies will be updated in order to work with octave3.0 (see
> the bugs blocking #457675).  As I wrote before, we are in a transition
> phase.  Hopefully the dust will settle down soon.

Is dropping the "Provides" line sufficient?

	Thomas