[Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#463039: why does octave3.0 provide: octave2.9?

Rafael Laboissiere rafael at debian.org
Tue Feb 5 11:22:40 UTC 2008


* Thomas Weber <thomas.weber.mail at gmail.com> [2008-02-05 09:33]:

> I'm for the the dummy 2.9 package. It has the added advantage of getting
> rid of the "octave" package in a sensible way (we simply don't build it
> anymore). 

Okay, if there are no further objections, I will soon implement the dummy
2.9 packages.  This means that we will have to use the infamous epoch again.

-- 
Rafael



More information about the Pkg-octave-devel mailing list