[Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#463039: why does octave3.0 provide: octave2.9?
Rafael Laboissiere
rafael at debian.org
Tue Feb 5 11:22:40 UTC 2008
* Thomas Weber <thomas.weber.mail at gmail.com> [2008-02-05 09:33]:
> I'm for the the dummy 2.9 package. It has the added advantage of getting
> rid of the "octave" package in a sensible way (we simply don't build it
> anymore).
Okay, if there are no further objections, I will soon implement the dummy
2.9 packages. This means that we will have to use the infamous epoch again.
--
Rafael
More information about the Pkg-octave-devel
mailing list