[Pkg-octave-devel] Choosing a sensible name for a new package split from octave3.0

Raphael Geissert atomo64+debian at gmail.com
Sat Sep 13 22:21:58 UTC 2008

Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
>     octave3.0-mscripts (although, there will be other files than *.m in
>     the
>         package)
> Suggestions?

Why not just octave3.0-scripts? (note the missing 'm').
It would make more sense than a -data or -common package to me as it really
describes the content.

Atomo64 - Raphael

Please avoid sending me Word, PowerPoint or Excel attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

More information about the Pkg-octave-devel mailing list