[Pkg-octave-devel] liboctave-dev insists on serial version of the hdf5 library
Sébastien Villemot
sebastien.villemot at ens.fr
Tue Aug 14 20:17:32 UTC 2012
Thomas Weber <tweber at debian.org> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 08:44:41AM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
>> My knowledge of the buildd is quite sparse, but I would guess that this
>> will not happen if the solution proposed by Sébastien is adopted, because
>> in the alternation of the liboctave-dev dependencies
>> libhdf5-dev|libhdf5-openmpi-dev|libhdf5-mpich2-dev, the buildds will
>> always pick the first one. Am I wrong?
>
> They will only pick the first one if none of the other two isn't
> installed already. Some time ago there was the idea to build packages in
> as "dirty" a chroot as possible.[1]
> I don't like that idea personally, but the fact is that nothing forbids
> a buildd maintainer from pre-installing packages (afaik, it's done with
> texlive on some embedded architectures because generating font files
> takes ages).
I see, there is indeed nothing in policy or other authoritative
documents that requires the buildd chroots to be clean.
Do you therefore consider that we should refrain from implementing the
proposed change, given the potential harm?
My personal opinion is unchanged because in practice buildd currently
use (almost) clean chroots, and many packages rely on that expectation
(I think of blas/lapack shlibs system for example). Also, the very same
solution with HDF5 alternatives did not create miscompilations in the
squeeze era.
My impression is that in the scientific world many people use parallel
HDF5 (though I personally don't). Not providing mkoctfile to these
people probably undermines the usefulness of our octave package. But of
course I cannot substantiate this claim with actual numbers of users.
The fact that nobody opened a bug report for this issue may be the sign
that my concerns are excessive.
--
.''`. Sébastien Villemot
: :' : Debian Maintainer
`. `' http://www.dynare.org/sebastien
`- GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-octave-devel/attachments/20120814/2bb36b4e/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Pkg-octave-devel
mailing list