[Pkg-octave-devel] [RFU] octave-sockets 1.0.7-2

[Sébastien Villemot]

Rafael Laboissiere <rafael at laboissiere.net> writes:

> I do not remember the good practice in this case.  The octave-sockets
> packages exists only in stable right now and perhaps it will go into the
> NEW queue after being uploaded to sid.  If this is really the case,
> perhaps we need to file an ITP.  Any clues?

Yes it will have to go through the NEW queue. As a side effect, only
Thomas can upload it.

I don't think we need an ITP in that case, they are not mandatory. ITPs
are useful for 1) giving the opportunity to DDs/DMs to give their
opinion about the opportunity of having the given package in Debian and
2) for avoiding duplication of work; in the case of this package it is
clear that it lives under the umbrella of the DOG. Let's avoid extra
bureaucracy.

-- 
Sébastien Villemot
Researcher in Economics & Debian Maintainer
http://www.dynare.org/sebastien
Phone: +33-1-40-77-84-04 - GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-octave-devel/attachments/20120621/575835af/attachment.pgp>