[Pkg-octave-devel] [RFU] octave-general 1.3.0-1

[Sébastien Villemot]

Rafael Laboissiere <rafael at laboissiere.net> writes:

> * Sébastien Villemot <sebastien.villemot at ens.fr> [2012-03-30 22:56]:
>
>> Rafael Laboissiere <rafael at laboissiere.net> writes:
>> 
>> > Please, upload it.
>> 
>> We may want to delay uploads of new releases of packages that have
>> already been ported, until everything has migrated to testing. If we
>> make new uploads now, it will reset the 10-days counter to zero.
>> 
>> But I leave the decision to you guys.
>
> Anything we can do to avoid delays in the transition will be welcome, for
> sure.  However, we are still not at the point we can "freeze" the
> packages, because there are still many packages that need upload, in
> particular those that are maintained outside the DOG.

Ok, I uploaded it. However I am not sure we have to wait for other
packages maintained outside the DOG before transitioning our packages to
testing.

> BTW, how is the transition going to be coordinated?  Will bug reports
> be filed against those packages outside the DOG?  Will the transition
> be managed by the release team or will we do everything ourselves?

The proposal that I gave in [1] still holds for me. Thomas, what do you
think?

[1] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-octave-devel/2012-March/008715.html

-- 
Sébastien Villemot
Researcher in Economics & Debian Maintainer
http://www.dynare.org/sebastien
Phone: +33-1-40-77-84-04 - GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-octave-devel/attachments/20120331/08ab2020/attachment-0001.pgp>