[Pkg-octave-devel] [Pkg-octave-commit] [SCM] Debian packaging for octave-control branch, experimental, created. debian/2.3.52-1-3-ga7845bb

[Sébastien Villemot]

Rafael Laboissiere <rafael at laboissiere.net> writes:

> * Sébastien Villemot <sebastien.villemot at ens.fr> [2012-09-06 12:16]:
>
>> Rafael Laboissiere <rafael at laboissiere.net> writes:
>> 
>> > I do not use pbuilder, so could you please tell which BLAS-related
>> > packages get and don't get installed in a clean chroot?
>> 
>> You should have libblas-dev installed, and libatlas3-base / libatlas-dev
>> / libopenblas-base / libopenblas-dev removed.
>> 
>> For a more complete list of installed packages, see a buildd log:
>> 
>>  https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=octave-control&arch=armel&ver=2.3.53-1&stamp=1346708920
>
> Ok, I have libblas-dev installed and ibatlas3-base / libatlas-dev /
> libopenblas-base / libopenblas-dev removed on my unstable chroot.  The
> tests are still failing, as in the following build log:
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=octave-control&arch=i386&ver=2.3.53-1&stamp=1346708061
>
> Notice that the tests succeed for some other architectures.

Interesting. This should probably be reported upstream, since it looks
like the explanation given by Lukas (ATLAS vs Netlib) is not correct.

-- 
 .''`.    Sébastien Villemot
: :' :    Debian Maintainer
`. `'     http://www.dynare.org/sebastien
  `-      GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-octave-devel/attachments/20120907/4a977d90/attachment.pgp>