[Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#790626: Octave FTBFS With Texinfo 6

Scott Kitterman debian at kitterman.com
Wed Jul 8 17:46:13 UTC 2015


On Wednesday, July 08, 2015 09:03:45 AM Mike Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 18:36:29 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> > Great, does that mean I don't need to investigate 3.8.2 build fixes
> > anymore? I am on a conference and low on time, so I couldn't
> > do more testing and fixing for the 3.8.2 version.
> 
> Yes, I think the patch I submitted should be sufficient.
> 
> I'll try to find some time to do a true source package build test with
> octave-3.8.2-xbackslash-texinfo.diff, but I'm also a little short on
> time at the moment. Scott, if you beat me to it that would be helpful.

Adding the patch and retrying the last failed build worked.  I'm trying a 
build in a clean chroot now using the attached proposed NMU debdiff.  If it 
builds, I'll upload it directly as previously mentioned (if any Octave 
maintainer would prefer I don't because they are taking care of it, please 
speak up).  I do not intend to NMU 4.0 in experimental since it's not needed 
to complete the transition.

Thanks to both Norbert and Mike for all your help.

Scott K
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: octave.nmu.debdiff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 14376 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-octave-devel/attachments/20150708/11502be6/attachment-0001.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-octave-devel/attachments/20150708/11502be6/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the Pkg-octave-devel mailing list