[Pkg-octave-devel] [RFU] octave-interval 1.2.0-1

[Sébastien Villemot]

Le mercredi 07 octobre 2015 à 22:43 +0200, Sébastien Villemot a écrit :

> - is the separation in two packages really necessary? My
> understanding
> is that separating arch-indep files is only warranted for big
> packages,
> because it saves space on the Debian ftp servers. In the present
> case,
> given that the package is small, I don't think that the overhead
> created by a separate -common package is warranted. I think it just
> adds complexity for no benefit. Or am I missing something?

Note that the Developers' reference seems to agree with me:

https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch06.html#bpp-archindepdata

-- 
 .''`.    Sébastien Villemot
: :' :    Debian Developer
`. `'     http://sebastien.villemot.name
  `-      GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-octave-devel/attachments/20151007/7d19727f/attachment.sig>