[Pkg-octave-devel] Unit test bug in octave-signal
Rafael Laboissière
rafael at debian.org
Mon Nov 13 15:36:05 UTC 2017
* Sébastien Villemot <sebastien at debian.org> [2017-11-13 16:18]:
> On Sun, Nov 05, 2017 at 09:14:08AM +0100, Rafael Laboissière wrote:
>> Version 1.3.2-3 of the octave-signal, uploaded yesterday to unstable, builds
>> correctly on i386. However, in order to achieve that, the first unit test
>> of function fir2 had to be bypassed [*]:
>>
>> #######################################
>> ***** xtest
>> f = [0 0.6 0.6 1]; m = [1 1 0 0];
>> b9 = fir2 (30, f, m, 9);
>> b16 = fir2 (30, f, m, 16);
>> b17 = fir2 (30, f, m, 17);
>> b32 = fir2 (30, f, m, 32);
>> assert ( isequal (b9, b16))
>> assert ( isequal (b17, b32))
>> assert (~isequal (b16, b17))
>> !!!!! known failure
>> assert (isequal (b9, b16)) failed
>> #######################################
>>
>> This is a highly strange bug that I cannot replicate on my i386 chroot
>> (running on an amd64 system). If someone has access to a native i386 system
>> and could track down the problem, I would be grateful.
>
> This test failure seems non-deterministic. I am able to reproduce it in my i386
> chroot, but had to run the build three times (without the fir2-*.patch) before
> getting an FTBFS.
I usually try to get non-deterministic failures from the command line,
like this:
while true ; do echo 'pkg load signal; test fir2' | octave-cli -qf ; done
Anyway, it is really mysterious why a test that does not involve random
generated values can have a non-deterministic behavior.
Rafael
More information about the Pkg-octave-devel
mailing list