[Pkg-ofed-devel] Bug#854217: Bug#854217: Bug#854217: mark libibverbs1 Multi-Arch: same
jgunthorpe at obsidianresearch.com
Mon Feb 6 18:08:12 UTC 2017
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 06:45:15PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> That's hard to answer without more insight into those packages than I
> have. In general, it is desirable to mark shared library packages, debug
> packages and development packages Multi-Arch: same, but such a marking
> is not always correct and an incorrect marking causes much harm.
> I have 3 suggestions:
> * Try to follow https://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/Implementation.
> * Upload those packages to Debian unstable (after stretch) and follow
> the "multiarch hinter" results on https://tracker.debian.org/<your
> source package>.
> * Upload those packages to Debian (e.g. experimental) and ask some
> multiarchy person (e.g. me) for help.
The design of the rdma-core stuff was done with multi-arch in mind, I
believe the following should be OK:
We have no arch specific headers, provide no install scripts (aside
from what dh produces) and do not use .pc or .la files.
ibverbs-providers needs some fixing however..
More information about the Pkg-ofed-devel