[Pkg-ofed-devel] RFS: qperf
Brian Smith
bsmith at systemfabricworks.com
Fri Nov 10 20:40:19 UTC 2017
Hi Afif,
Thanks for your feedback. I've made the changes that you suggested.
Also, I've changed the upstream source to the linux-rdma github repository
and updated the code to 0.4.10.
Regarding the copyright, BSD should not have been in there and has been
removed. COPYING is identical to /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2. The
GPL-2 license section in copyright now contains the GPL-2 notice and a
pointer to /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2. Please let me know if that is
not the right thing to do.
Thanks, again!
Brian T. Smith
System Fabric Works
Senior Technical Staff
bsmith at systemfabricworks.com
(512) 293-4472
GPG Key: B3C2C7B73BA3CD7F
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 11:56 PM, Afif Elghraoui <afif at debian.org> wrote:
>
>
> على الخميس 9 تشرين الثاني 2017 11:19، كتب Brian Smith:
> > Hello Afif,
> >
> > Sorry for cross-posting. I wasn't sure if the forwarding from pkg-ofed
> > is yet configured.
>
> No worries. It turns out not to be the reason why I'm getting duplicate
> messages, so I'm restoring the cross-posting.
>
> >
> > To answer your question, I am subscribed to debian-hpc.
> >
>
> Ok, so I can just reply-list now. :)
>
> > I really appreciate your reviewing the qperf package and look forward
> > to your feedback. Thanks!
> >
>
> Here we go.
>
> debian/control
> ==============
>
> > Depends: ${misc:Depends},
> > ${shlibs:Depends},
> > libibverbs1,
> > librdmacm1
>
> ${shlibs:Depends} will handle the shared library dependencies for you,
> along with minimal versions where possible. You shouldn't set those
> shared library dependencies manually unless absolutely necessary. If I
> build after removing those two explicit lines, I get the final package
> appropriately having:
>
> Depends: libc6 (>= 2.15), libibverbs1 (>= 1.1.6), librdmacm1 (>= 1.0.19)
>
> debian/rules
> ============
> With debhelper compat 10, parallel and autoreconf are enabled by default
> [1], so you can simply use `dh $@`.
>
>
> debian/changelog
> ================
> The changelog gets updated once per upload. Everything as of now is part
> of the initial release, so you should just get rid of the everything
> else there. I'll change the target distribution once it's ready to go,
> right before I build the version to upload.
>
>
> debian/copyright
> ================
> * The source code indicates GPL 2, not GPL 2+. You have correctly
> labeled it GPL-2, but the text you included has the "or (at your option)
> any later version" clause. That should be removed for this package.
>
> * The BSD option is for a 2-clause license, not 3. Please correct this;
> and it's best to use the exact wording they give for the license text.
>
> debian/tests
> ============
> Since the debian/tests/control file here defines no tests, I don't see a
> reason for this directory to exist.
>
> debian/docs
> ===========
> The NEWS file is empty; I wouldn't install an empty file.
>
>
> Everything else looks good to me. Let me know when I should have another
> look--and no need to upload to mentors; I'm working with the git
> repository. Thanks for working on this package!
>
> regards
> Afif
>
> 1. https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/04/msg00018.html
>
> --
> Afif Elghraoui | عفيف الغراوي
> http://afif.ghraoui.name
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pkg-ofed-devel mailing list
> Pkg-ofed-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ofed-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-ofed-devel/attachments/20171110/dc35dc81/attachment.html>
More information about the Pkg-ofed-devel
mailing list