[Pkg-opennebula-devel] Bug#611282: Bug#611282: Seperate client package
Damien Raude-Morvan
drazzib at debian.org
Fri Feb 11 18:28:33 UTC 2011
Hi Willem,
JFTR, upstream is also working on something similar to our "split" proposal :
http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/482
That would be nice if it's also supported by upstream and not only by Debian.
Le jeudi 27 janvier 2011 18:57:53, wvengen+pkg-opennebula-devel at nikhef.nl a
écrit :
> > IMHO, we have to split actual opennebula package in something like :
> Looks good, but see comments.
>
> > - libopennebula-ruby (all /usr/lib/one/ruby/ ? split client and server
> > part ?)
> it's about 600k ... I'd leave it one package
Agreed.
> > - opennebula-tools (onevm & others CLI tools)
> or maybe opennebula-client
> > - opennebula (oned, sched_mm and all /etc/one )
> opennebula-server? (which would recommend the client, I guess)
That seems a little weird to install "opennebula-server" if its depends on
"opennebula-client" :) That's why I would prefer to stick with a package named
like "opennebula-tools"...
> - opennebula
> possibly meta-package containing dependencies for client+server,
> or maybe a transitional package to opennebula-server and -client?
Yep, I would vote for a meta-package.
Cheers,
--
Damien - Debian Developper
http://wiki.debian.org/DamienRaudeMorvan
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-opennebula-devel/attachments/20110211/2eb4f891/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Pkg-opennebula-devel
mailing list