[Pkg-opennebula-devel] Bug#674290: opennebula: Use a less "volatile" home for node files than /var/tmp/one/

Olivier Berger olivier.berger at it-sudparis.eu
Thu May 24 09:11:04 UTC 2012

Package: opennebula
Version: 3.2.1-2
Severity: wishlist


AFAIU, One nodes will get /var/tmp/one populated with the scripts necessary for deploying VMs, etc.

I fear this is a bit risky, as I don't consider these scripts and conf files (if any?) temporary, once the node has been created. I think it would make more sense to have these inside some /var/lib/one-node/ or similar path, so that one will not inadvertantly remove them.

What's your opinion (besides issues of migration, but that can probably be configured with a PATH variable to adjust to systems deployed already with previous versions of the packages) ?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (300, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages opennebula depends on:
ii  apg                2.2.3.dfsg.1-2
ii  genisoimage        9:1.1.11-2
ii  libc6              2.13-32
ii  libgcc1            1:4.7.0-8
ii  libmysqlclient16   5.1.61-3
ii  libsqlite3-0       3.7.11-3
ii  libssl1.0.0        1.0.1c-1
ii  libstdc++6         4.7.0-8
ii  libxml2            2.7.8.dfsg-9
ii  libxmlrpc-c++4     1.16.33-3.1
ii  libxmlrpc-core-c3  1.16.33-3.1
ii  opennebula-tools   3.2.1-2
ii  wget               1.13.4-3

opennebula recommends no packages.

Versions of packages opennebula suggests:
pn  mysql-server     <none>
pn  ruby-amazon-ec2  <none>

-- debconf-show failed

More information about the Pkg-opennebula-devel mailing list