[Pkg-osg-devel] Bug: #690878 "pkg-config reports wrong path"
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
manuel.montezelo at gmail.com
Wed Nov 21 09:21:59 UTC 2012
2012/11/21 Alberto Luaces <aluaces at udc.es>:
>> Any clue? Maybe because of the changes of DESTDIR and so on? There
>> is no "No space left on device" kind of error, but maybe it's because
>> of that (/tmp as tmpfs, and no previous errors for similar
>> files/paths).
>
> I will investigate; in my build, osgdb_serializers_osgparticle.so
> compiles and it is also present in the resulting .deb.
I will also try to build today in a different machine.
>> Finally, is it needed compat 9 at all, or can the hardening work with
>> previous levels with the current rules file? As [I think that] I said
>> previously, I am not sure if the change is going to be approved this
>> late into the freeze if it's possible to achieve the same effect with
>> more intrusive changes. Compat level 9 makes some hardening things
>> automatic, but I think that with the following lines that you used is
>> possible with 8, not sure with compat 7:
>>
>> DPKG_EXPORT_BUILDFLAGS = 1
>> include /usr/share/dpkg/buildflags.mk
>
> The debhelper upgrade to level 9 was one of the things I did on summer.
> I don't remember exactly because of lintian or the hardening flags
> addition, but somewhere I read that it was advisable to change it. Then
> I followed the documentation in order to know how to use the hardening
> flags, and at least at the time, the DPKG_EXPORT_BUILDFLAGS approach was
> suggested.
>
> I'll get back to you with new information.
I asked release managers in the other e-mail, so if they give the
go-ahead it's better for us. You can defer/avoid investigating
until/unless they don't want us to use dh level 9.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montezelo at gmail.com>
More information about the Pkg-osg-devel
mailing list