[Pkg-osm-maint] Bug#705548: josm: backport josm

[David Paleino]

On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 18:12:55 +0200, colliar wrote:

> Why not just adapt migration policy from testing ?
> So testing and stable-backport will be the same version.

I can try.

> I do not know your update circles. But I would expect experimental to
> have at maximum a delay of ten days compared to JOSM tested and unstable
> one month.
> 
> ATM (numbers from [1] and [2]):
> - experimental (r5759) - six weeks
> - unstable (r5608) - 20 weeks
> - testing (r5267 with some patches) - at least eight month
> - stable (r3376) - two years and nine month

This is because I have a stable internet connection only on weekends. During
the week, I work far from my home city, and only have 100MB/day of bandwidth.
And, please understand, that downloading and uploading josm would suck ~30MB of
that.

Thanks for understanding,
David

-- 
 . ''`.   Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
 : :'  : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
 `. `'`  GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://deb.li/dapal
   `-   2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-osm-maint/attachments/20130420/b9c8100e/attachment.pgp>